How is the Eastern Africa Power Pool Day-Ahead Market structured and how are market-clearing prices determined

How is the Eastern Africa Power Pool (EAPP) Day-Ahead Market structured, and how are market-clearing prices determined?

The Eastern Africa Power Pool (EAPP) Day-Ahead Market (DAM) marks a massive transition from long-term, rigid bilateral contracts to a competitive, short-term regional power market. It functions as a centralized, blind-auction platform where member utilities can buy and sell electricity for the next day based on real-time availability and economic efficiency.

Castalia Advisors

The DAM’s structural framework and mathematical price-clearing mechanics operate as follows:

1. Market Structure & Key Governance Organs

The EAPP DAM operates as an hourly, centralized spot market managed through a coordinated multi-tiered governance structure:

[Independent Regulatory Board (IRB)]  –> Sets Policy & Market Rules

               |

[Centrally Organized Market Operator] –> Runs Trading Engine & Clears Market

               |

[National Control Areas (TSOs)]       –> Submits Grid Limits & Dispatches Power

               |

[Market Participants (GenCos/DisCos)] –> Submits Hourly Price/Volume Bids

  • The Market Operator (MO): Operating out of the designated regional market hub in Egypt, the MO administers the centralized IT and trading platforms. It receives all bids, runs the market-clearing software, calculates prices, and handles financial settlements through a regional settlement bank.
  • The System Operators / Transmission System Operators (TSOs): Each country’s domestic grid operator (like Kenya Power or Ethiopia Electric Power) manages its own Control Area. TSOs do not buy or sell power themselves; instead, they calculate and submit the Available Transfer Capacity (ATC) for cross-border interconnectors to the MO before the auction opens.
  • Market Participants: Validated state-owned utilities and licensed Independent Power Producers (IPPs) act as the buyers (Distribution Companies/DisCos) and sellers (Generation Companies/GenCos).
  • Independent Regulatory Board (IRB): The EAPP’s independent regulatory organ that reviews market data, ensures transparency, and mitigates anti-competitive bidding behaviors or market manipulation.

2. The Trading Timeline (Day-Ahead Workflow)

The DAM executes a strict, automated 24-hour cycle to establish the dispatch schedule for the following operating day:

  • Gate Opening & ATC Publication: The TSOs evaluate grid safety and line constraints, submitting the maximum allowable cross-border power flows (ATC) to the trading platform.
  • Bidding Windows: Market participants log into the EAPP trading interface and submit hourly bids for all 24 hours of the upcoming day. Sellers state the minimum price they will accept to generate a specific volume of MW, while buyers state the maximum price they are willing to pay.
  • Gate Closure & Optimization Run: The market platform closes to submissions. The trading engine executes a high-power optimization algorithm that matches buyers and sellers globally across the entire interconnected pool.
  • Result Publication: Financial commitments and physical dispatch schedules are sent out to the participants and national TSOs for implementation.

3. How Market-Clearing Prices (MCP) Are Determined

The EAPP DAM relies on a competitive economic merit-order dispatch system using a single-price closed auction format.

Step 1: Curve Aggregation

For every single hour of the next operating day, the Market Operator’s software pools all buy and sell offers across the interconnected region to construct two master curves:

  1. The Supply Curve (Merit Order): Generated by ranking all generation offers from the absolute cheapest (e.g., zero-marginal-cost hydro from Uganda or geothermal from Kenya) to the most expensive (e.g., diesel or heavy fuel oil plants).
  2. The Demand Curve: Generated by ranking buyer bids from the highest willingness-to-pay down to the lowest.

Step 2: Finding the Unconstrained Market-Clearing Price

In a hypothetical scenario with unlimited transmission capacity, the Market-Clearing Price (MCP) is found exactly where the aggregate supply curve intersects the aggregate demand curve. This point maximizes social welfare (the total economic benefit to all buyers and sellers combined).

Every generation asset cleared to the left of this intersection point is selected to produce power, and every buyer to the left is cleared to consume it. Under standard pool rules, a single, uniform marginal price is paid to all cleared suppliers, regardless of how low their original bid was.

Step 3: Managing Structural Bottlenecks (Market Splitting)

In reality, power grids face physical limitations. If a massive amount of cheap power from Ethiopia wants to flow south to Kenya and Tanzania, it may exceed the maximum thermal or stability limits of the 500 kV HVDC or 400 kV lines.

When this cross-border limit is hit—a scenario known as transmission congestion—the EAPP engine triggers Market Splitting:

  • The single pool breaks into isolated Bidding Zones.
  • The software runs separate price calculations for the export region and the import region.
  • The export region (e.g., Ethiopia/Uganda), bursting with low-cost generation it can no longer send away, experiences a drop in its local Market-Clearing Price.
  • The import region (e.g., Kenya/Tanzania), short on cheap imports, must turn on its more expensive domestic generation assets, driving up its local Market-Clearing Price.

The price disparity between these zones directly reflects the economic cost of the grid congestion, sending a clear financial signal to the EAPP planning committees showing exactly where new transmission lines need to be built to further drive down regional electricity costs.

Leave a Reply